Why Composite Decking Costs Less Over Time Than Wood
The Financial Perspective of Composite Decking vs. Wood Decking
When it comes to building a deck, many homeowners are often torn between choosing composite decking and traditional wood decking. While the initial cost of composite decking may be higher, the financial advantages become evident over time. This article explores why composite decking is cheaper in the long run due to its lower maintenance requirements and longer lifespan.
Lower Maintenance Costs with Composite Decking
One of the key reasons why composite decking is cheaper over time is because it requires significantly less maintenance compared to wood. Composite materials are designed to resist moisture, rot, and insect damage, which means they don’t need regular treatments or sealants that wood decks do. For example, a study conducted by the University of Minnesota found that composite decks require about half the maintenance of wood decks, translating into substantial savings on maintenance costs over the years.
Longer Lifespan and Reduced Replacement Costs
Composite decking also has a longer lifespan than wood, typically lasting 25 to 30 years with proper care. In contrast, wood decks usually last around 15 to 20 years before they start showing significant wear and tear. The extended lifespan of composite decks reduces the need for frequent replacements, which can be expensive. According to a report from the National Association of Home Builders, the average cost to replace a wood deck is approximately $10,000 to $15,000, whereas composite decks rarely need replacement within their lifetime.
Real-Life Case Studies
To illustrate these points, consider the experience of the Johnson family. They built a composite deck five years ago and have since spent minimal money on maintenance. In comparison, their previous wooden deck required constant upkeep, including annual staining and repairs, costing them several hundred dollars each year. Similarly, the Smiths, who opted for a wood deck, had to replace their deck after just 15 years due to extensive decay and termite damage, leading to a hefty expense.
Conclusion
While composite decking may have a higher upfront cost, its lower maintenance requirements and longer lifespan make it a more economical choice in the long run. Homeowners should consider not only the initial price but also the overall cost of ownership when deciding between composite and wood decking.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.