Cellular PVC Decking vs Composite: A Comprehensive Analysis

Name: cellular pvc decking vs composite
SKU: 13013
Availability: InStock

Durability: Cellular PVC vs Composite

When it comes to durability, both cellular PVC and composite decking materials have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. Cellular PVC is known for its exceptional resistance to moisture, which means it won’t warp or swell like traditional wood decks. According to a study by the University of Kentucky, cellular PVC is highly resistant to rot and decay (University of Kentucky, 2015). However, it can be prone to cracking under extreme temperature changes. On the other hand, composite decking materials, such as Trex, are made from a mixture of wood fibers and plastic, making them more durable against scratches and dents. They are also less likely to crack compared to cellular PVC (Trex, 2023).

Maintenance: Cellular PVC vs Composite

Maintenance requirements can significantly influence a homeowner’s decision. Cellular PVC decking requires minimal maintenance. It doesn’t need staining or sealing, which makes it an attractive option for those looking for low-maintenance solutions. However, it does require regular cleaning with soap and water to prevent discoloration. Composite decking, while still relatively low-maintenance, requires periodic cleaning and occasional re-sanding to maintain its appearance. Composite materials are less prone to staining than cellular PVC but may fade over time without proper care (DeckSurfaces, 2022).

Cost: Cellular PVC vs Composite

In terms of initial costs, cellular PVC decking tends to be more expensive than composite decking. The average cost of cellular PVC per square foot ranges from $8 to $12, whereas composite materials typically range from $7 to $10 per square foot (HomeAdvisor, 2023). However, over time, the cost difference may even out due to the lower maintenance needs of cellular PVC. Composite materials often require replacement parts and professional cleaning, which can add to long-term expenses.

Appearance: Cellular PVC vs Composite

The appearance of both materials can vary widely depending on the manufacturer and the specific product line. Cellular PVC offers a consistent, uniform look that mimics natural wood without the inconsistencies found in real wood. It can be painted or stained to match any aesthetic preference. Composite materials, however, offer a wider range of colors and textures, including options that closely resemble natural wood grain. This variety allows homeowners to choose a style that best fits their home’s exterior design (CompositeDecking.com, 2023).

Environmental Impact: Cellular PVC vs Composite

Both cellular PVC and composite materials are considered environmentally friendly alternatives to traditional wood decking. However, they differ in their eco-friendliness. Cellular PVC is made entirely from synthetic materials, which means it doesn’t contribute to deforestation. Composite materials, on the other hand, are made from recycled wood fibers and plastics, reducing waste and providing a sustainable solution. Both materials are recyclable at the end of their lifespan, although the recycling process for composite materials can be more complex (EPA, 2021).

Real-Life Examples and Expert Opinions

According to a survey conducted by the National Association of Home Builders, many homeowners prefer cellular PVC for its longevity and ease of maintenance. However, experts like Mike Guertin, a well-known builder and writer, suggest that composite materials might be a better choice for those who prioritize aesthetics and want a more natural look (Guertin, 2022).

Conclusion

Choosing between cellular PVC and composite decking ultimately depends on your priorities. If you value low maintenance and durability, cellular PVC might be the better option. For those who prefer a natural wood-like appearance and don’t mind slightly higher maintenance, composite materials could be ideal. Both materials offer significant benefits in terms of durability and environmental sustainability.